NEW YORK EVIDENCE
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEW YORK STATE EVIDENCE AND THE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCEThree Advocacy Styles, One Law Student: Why Every Law Student Should Try Advocacy At Least Once
When I started my first semester of law school, no one could convince me to do any sort of advocacy. I was completely set on focusing on contract, transactional, and corporate law. The thought of participating in one, let alone three, advocacy experiences never...
Mastering the Opening Statement
An opening statement provides the initial opportunity to set the tone for the trial. In this moment, you introduce the key players, outline the key events of the case, and, most importantly, establish a connection with the jury by integrating the facts, emotions, and...
Hearsay in New York
Time to discuss hearsay. Rather, a small bit of hearsay theory. Since hearsay is a common law principle, New York’s hearsay rules are largely similar to the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE). Hearsay is universally defined as “an out-of-court statement offered to prove...
New York’s Prior Bad Acts & Character Evidence
New York’s treatment of prior bad acts and character evidence is, as usual, slightly different than the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE). This blog picks up right where my good friend Ashley Corbin’s leaves off.[1] In New York, propensity is still a major risk with...
Differences Between New York Evidence & Federal Evidence Rules
Part I: Opening Statement Indulge me for a few minutes. Imagine you’re an Assistant District Attorney (“ADA”) in Brooklyn Criminal Court. You are conducting the direct examination of the complainant in a gang assault case. This is how the testimony goes during your...
Reach Us
Communicate with us or follow us on our social media! For questions or if you would like to contribute, contact Professor Jared Hatcliffe or Julia Stueber.
Advocatesadvantage@law.pace.edu
78 N Broadway, White Plains, NY 10603
Recent Comments